Sony Fe 24-105mm F/4 G Oss Review 2019

The Sony FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS is a compact and a applied zoom for a wide range of subjects and situations faced by both photographers and videographers.

The stabilized zoom lens has 17 elements bundled in 14 groups and has a number of exotic glass types to enhance performance. These include three ED (extra-low dispersion) elements to reduce chromatic aberration, two aspherical elements, and 2 AA (avant-garde aspherical) elements that employ advanced molding techniques to achieve their highly aspherical shape.

It also has Sony's Nano AR blanket to suppress flare and ghosting, a fluorine blanket on the front to reduce marking and meliorate cleaning, and features a grit- and moisture-resistant blueprint.

The lens uses a direct bulldoze SSM (linear-blazon) focus motor and has a 0.38m minimum focusing distance. Information technology'due south one of the lighter of its type at 663 grams (23.4 oz) and is available now for effectually $i,200/1,350€.

You can view the results for all tested lenses and create your own comparisons and in-depth analyses using our interactive image lens comparison tool.

Key specifications:

• 17 elements in 14 groups
• four aspherical and 3 ED elements
• Optical stabilizer
• Linear focus motor
• Dust- and moisture-resistant
• 77 mm filter thread
• Minimum focus distance: 0.38m (1.25 ft)
• Weight: 663 grams (23.four oz)

Test results

We tested the Sony FE 24-105mm F4 K OSS on the 61 MP Sony A7R Four, the highest-resolution camera in Sony'due south Blastoff full-frame mirrorless lineup. Together, the optical organisation of lens and sensor achieved a DXOMARK score of 30, which is highly competitive with rival lenses of this type mounted on similarly high spatial resolution sensors, such as the Canon EF 24-105mm F4L USM II and the Sigma 24-105mm F4 DG OS HSM A on the fifty MP Canon EOS 5DS R. As information technology's a system rating of lens and sensor, the DXOMARK score would in theory be a picayune lower on the 47 MP Sony A7R III and so lower still on the 24 MP Sony A7 III, but it's always worth looking through the more than detailed information to see how the performance differs.

Sharpness levels are good for this type of zoom, especially at 105 mm, which is unusual. In addition, the lens controls LaCA (lateral chromatic aberration) relatively well at that length as well. However, at shorter focal lengths, particularly at 24 mm, there'southward noticeable fringing at the edges and in the corners in detail. Vignetting is extremely well controlled; and the lens has good control of distortion along with good transmission, measured at T4.four, which is a loss of just -0.4 EV on boilerplate. Overall, the lens is one of the all-time-performing models covering this range.

In-depth comparisons

We've compared the made-for-mirrorless Sony Grand-serial lens with similarly stabilized 24-105mm F4 models, though in fairness they're fabricated for DSLRs. Sigma'south 24-105mm F4 DG Bone HSM is a high-grade Art series lesn with a reputation as being one of the best of its type. Information technology was appear in late 2017 and is available for effectually $899, or 1,000€. We've also compared the Sony with the highly regarded Canon EF 24-105mm F4 50 2 USM. This Mark 2 version received an upgrade from the original model during the summer of 2016, and is available now for around $1,100 or 1,070€.

Y'all tin see an overview of this comparing in our database.

Sharpness

The Sony FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS has good sharpness; indeed, information technology is among the best nosotros've tested and rivals the Sigma overall. All the same, while virtually zooms are sharper at the shorter end, the Sony is unusual in that it's besides sharp at 105 mm likewise. Sharpness at that focal length is consistent beyond the field besides and that puts it ahead of both the Catechism and the Sigma.

Still, there are some downsides. Wide open, the Sony has some noticeable loss of sharpness at the intermediate focal lengths of 35 mm and l mm, at least when compared to the Sigma; the highly respected Catechism is weaker all the same. Once stopped downward a cease, all three perform similarly at 24 mm, simply it is the Sony and Sigma that continue to impress at the other focal lengths. Even then it's not a clear win for the Sony, every bit it shows higher levels of astigmatism in the outer field at fifty mm and seventy mm.

Chromatic aberration

Despite this being a high-end K-serial lens with a number of ED drinking glass elements, there'south some noticeable lateral color at the wider end — below 50 mm, anyway. While information technology's most noticeable in the corners at 24 mm, it doesn't get whatsoever better after stopping down. Of the three in this comparison, the Canon is the best corrected, and fifty-fifty the highly regarded Sigma isn't a lucifer, with that model having quite loftier levels across the field, non only at the edges or in corners. All three are relatively well controlled at longer focal lengths, though interestingly, it is the Sony that has the lowest levels at 105 mm.

Geometric distortion

Both the Sigma and Canon are better corrected for distortion. The Sony has slightly more barrel distortion at 24 mm, measured at +one.v% against the + 0.8-.9% of the two rivals, and it has slightly more pincushion-blazon baloney at the other stop. Nevertheless, information technology's relatively low fifty-fifty at its almost pronounced, measuring -0.nine% from 50 mm through 105 mm. And it'southward important to remember that distortion similar this is easy to adjust in mail-production.

Vignetting (corner shading)

Vignetting is very well controlled at every focal length in the Sony, much better than either the Sigma or Canon. With the maximum less than -one EV at 24 mm, at that place'south none of the nighttime corners seen in the other ii when wide open, and there's none to speak of after closing downwards a stop.

Transmission

This is one expanse that arguably doesn't really concern stills photographers that much, just the practical nature of the 24-105mm zoom, with its stock-still F4 maximum discontinuity, makes it an of import model for videographers. Fortunately, transmission doesn't vary much throughout the zoom range, with it differing from -0.three EV at 24mm to -0.4EV at 105 mm. In terms of calorie-free loss information technology's bettered just slightly by the Sigma, but none of them are exactly bad.

Determination

For all this lens'southward entreatment to the stills and video communities, Sony added its 24-105mm F4 to the range relatively late, but the upside is that it is the most modern of the three— at least in this comparison. Not but that, it'south a Grand-series model as well, and then information technology gives you an indication of the performance to expect. While stronger than the Catechism EF mountain equivalent, there isn't that much between it and the Sigma. Whether that's enough to make it a compelling option for Sony users is debatable: it'due south good, but it's not exactly inexpensive.

In this review, we accept compared the Sony Iron 24-105mm F4 G OSS mounted on a Sony A7R IV to its closest rivals from other brands. Retrieve that those lenses may exist used on different cameras or, in some cases, on unlike camera systems using different mounts, so those comparisons are non strictly applicative.

As usual, you lot can create your own comparisons and in-depth analyses using our interactive image lens comparison tool.

hurleyhimanxim43.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.dxomark.com/sony-fe-24-105mm-f4-g-oss-lens-review-good-performer-but-pricey/

Share this post